Home  
0
0

Contact Us

Feedback Form

About Us

Web Links

Visit this group

The Crash of 2008 and Historical Materialism

Why a Philosophy of the Natural Sciences is Needed

My European Vacation: Interviews with Working-class Leaders

Lessons in Coalition Politics: The Indian Left and the Indo-US Nuclear Deal

The Rosenberg Case in Historical Perspective

Yes We Can Shut Down the SOA

The Struggle for Women’s Equality in the US Today

Another Crisis of Capitalism

Reflections on the (Unplanned) Death of an Ideology

How to Reform Medicare and Create National Health Care

Reflexiones sobre la muerte (imprevista) de una ideología

Sagebrush Noir: The Western as 'Social Problem' Film

Book Review: Democracy's Prisoner

Book Review: The Politics of Immigration

CD Review: Pete Seeger: At 89

December 2008 Poetry

Table of Contents for December 2008 – January 2009 issue

/Archives - Dates and Topics /2005 – online /September – October 2005 /Oct. 10 – 16 Print | Send to friend

Judge Stops Bush Effort to Eliminate Federal Workers’ Rights



click here for related stories: labor movement
10-11-05,8:32am

Oct. 7—In a major win for federal workers, a U.S. judge for the second time denied the Bush administration’s efforts to destroy the civil service system covering 160,000 employees at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

The Bush administration had asked U.S. District Judge Rosemary M. Collyer to narrow her Aug. 12 ruling blocking new personnel rules that would have virtually eliminated employees’ bargaining and workplace rights and ended civil service pay scales. On Oct. 7, Collyer rejected the administration’s request and accepted the unions’ argument that the rules essentially would eliminate the collective bargaining process.

After DHS issued the rules in January, AFGE and four other unions filed suit, arguing that significant parts of the proposed personnel system would violate the Homeland Security Act.

‘Let Us Improve the Personnel System Together’
In her original ruling, Collyer said the administration’s rules would result in federal unions bargaining “on quicksand,” because the department “would retain the right to change the underlying bases for the bargaining relationship and absolve itself of contract obligations while the unions would be bound.” Collyer, in the latest ruling, urged DHS officials to revisit the personnel system in a “renewed rule-making effort.”

A few days before the Oct. 7 ruling, AFGE President John Gage wrote DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff urging him to scrap the proposed rules and work with the unions to create a better system. “Shall we continue to debate the personnel system in the Congress through litigation or shall we jointly design a system that works? We ask you to throw out the regulations. Sit down with us and let us improve the DHS personnel system together,” Gage wrote.

Gage pointed out that 98 percent of the people, mostly DHS employees, who responded to the proposal during the federal comment period, opposed the regulations. “Nobody cares more about the mission of DHS than do these employees,” Gage said. “The front-line employees are now looking to you, wondering if you stand for their interests or against them,” he added.

Commenting on the implications of Collyer’s ruling on Defense Department employees, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers President Gregory Junemann says, “Once again, Judge Collyer has confirmed what we in the labor community have been correctly claiming for some time now…it is not a stretch to assume that a court would likely rule the NSPS contrary to law as well.”

IFPTE, AFGE and more than 30 other unions have formed the United Department of Defense Workers Coalition to oppose the new Pentagon personnel rules.




» PA Home » PA Online Edition » September/October Print Edition Subscribe to PA





blog comments powered by Disqus
Take a Stand
( 10/01/2003 18:49 )


newcatcher@cpusa.org