Home  
0
0

Contact Us

Feedback Form

About Us

Web Links

Visit this group

Ponzi Capitalism and the Deepening Moral Crisis

The Roller Coaster: The Communist Party in the 1940s

Rebuilding the Labor Movement in the 21st Century, an Interview with Scott Marshall

Police Escalate Attacks on First Amendment Rights

Public Option: Worth the Fight

Our Socialist Inheritance and Future

Past, Present and Future: The Politics of Reform in the Era of Obama

Needed: Constitutional Amendment for the Right to a Earn a Living Wage

Why Should Grassroots Liberals Consider Marxism?

Is That Specter Really Collapsing?

Carlo Tresca: The Dilemma of an Anti-Communist Radical

The Brief, Revolutionary Life of Joe Hill

Movie Review: Giải phóng Sài Gòn

Review: Logicomix: An Epic Search for Truth

Poetry, November 2009

/Archives - Dates and Topics /2005 – online /November – December 2005 /Dec. 5 – 11 Print | Send to friend

News For Working Families- Reports on CEO Pay: How High Is Too High?



click here for related stories: labor movement
12-9-05,9:45am

Dec. 6—The gap between CEOs’ pay and workers’ pay continues to rapidly widen, with the average CEO making 431 times the salary of a production worker in 2004, up from 301 to one in 2003. In the mid 1960s, the average CEO made 24 times a workers’ annual pay, according to the nonprofit Economic Policy Institute (EPI).

Several additional recent studies highlight how extensively executive pay is skyrocketing, even as workers’ wages are stagnant or dropping. In fiscal 2004, total compensation for the CEO of a median U.S. company rose across the board, with corporate officials in the energy industry getting the biggest pay hikes: 46.1 percent, according to a new report by the Conference Board, a business research group. At the same time, the average CEO took home a 91 percent raise in 2004, according to the Corporate Library, an investor research firm.

Workers Produce More, Get Paid Less
Yet U.S. workers, who are more productive than ever before, are not reaping the benefits of their labor. Worker productivity increased 4.7 percent during the third quarter of 2005, according to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics. Meanwhile, real hourly wages and benefits decreased by 1.4 percent, compared with an even higher 3.1 percent decrease in the previous quarter.

The combination of lagging workers’ compensation and higher productivity are fueling soaring profits, creating a historically unique pattern, according to EPI.

Proposed legislation in Congress would give shareholders more control over runaway executive compensation. The Protection Against Executive Compensation Abuse Act, H.R. 4291, would require public companies to include in their annual reports a comprehensive, shareholder-approved “Executive Compensation Plan.” The plan would disclose all compensation paid to top executives, such as pensions or golden parachute agreements; the performance targets used to determine the top executive’s compensation; and the company’s policy for recapturing any compensation that is found to be unjustified.

“We have witnessed a number of high profile executive pay packages that are hidden to the owners of the company, the shareholders, and I want to make sure we have full disclosure,” said Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who introduced the measure in November. “We are not taking anybody’s pay or even setting any limits, we just believe these owners should know how [management is] being paid and have some ability to do something about it if they so desire.”

Frank is the ranking Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee. The bill is co-sponsored by Reps. George Miller (D-Calif.) and Martin Sabo (D-Minn.).

“Excessive CEO pay takes money out of the pocketbooks of shareholders, including the retirement savings of America’s working families,” AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka says. “Year after year, CEO pay levels show little apparent relationship to corporate profits, economic growth, or executive performance. Moreover, a poorly designed executive compensation package can reward decisions that are not in the long-term interests of a company, its shareholders and employees.”


» PA Home » PA Online Edition » November Print Edition Subscribe to PA





blog comments powered by Disqus
Take a Stand
( 10/01/2003 18:49 )


newcatcher@cpusa.org