Home  
0
0

Contact Us

Feedback Form

About Us

Web Links

Visit this group

Ponzi Capitalism and the Deepening Moral Crisis

The Roller Coaster: The Communist Party in the 1940s

Rebuilding the Labor Movement in the 21st Century, an Interview with Scott Marshall

Police Escalate Attacks on First Amendment Rights

Public Option: Worth the Fight

Our Socialist Inheritance and Future

Past, Present and Future: The Politics of Reform in the Era of Obama

Needed: Constitutional Amendment for the Right to a Earn a Living Wage

Why Should Grassroots Liberals Consider Marxism?

Is That Specter Really Collapsing?

Carlo Tresca: The Dilemma of an Anti-Communist Radical

The Brief, Revolutionary Life of Joe Hill

Movie Review: Giải phóng Sài Gòn

Review: Logicomix: An Epic Search for Truth

Poetry, November 2009

/Archives - Dates and Topics /2005 – online /January – February 2005 /Jan. 10-15 Print | Send to friend

Bush's Invitation to Abbas Rings Hollow



click here for related stories: Middle East

One-sided welcome
From Morning Star

US President George W Bush welcomed the election of Mahmoud Abbas as the Palestinian people's new president, asserting US readiness "to help the Palestinian people realise their aspirations."

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas

However, he went on to detail the critical tasks facing the new Palestinian president and his cabinet as "fighting terrorism, combating corruption, building reformed and democratic institutions and reviving the Palestinian economy."

The one task that he omitted is the basis on which Mr Abbas was backed by the electors to succeed Yasser Arafat.

That task is to secure an end to Israel's occupation and colonisation of Palestinian land and to build a sovereign Palestinian state in line with the pre-June 1967 borders and with its capital in east Jerusalem.

Mr Abbas also recognised that there could be no lasting solution without a just settlement of the Palestinian refugee question, with five million Palestinians forced to live outside their homeland as a result of nearly 60 years of ethnic cleansing and the military occupation's refusal to allow them to return home.

Combating corruption, building reformed and democratic institutions and reviving the economy are all worthwhile aspirations - and not solely in Palestine - but their relevance is weakened if they are expected to flourish under a brutal colonial regime.

And, while "fighting terrorism" is high on the list of both President Bush and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, they refer only to the activities of Palestinian resistance.

Israel's state terrorism, with its use of aerial power, tanks and armoured bulldozers against overcrowded refugee camps, is regarded either as normal policing arrangements or legitimate self-defence by Israel.

Messrs Bush and Sharon referred to President Arafat as an obstacle to peace, but, since this obstacle was removed with the president's death, 75 Palestinians have been killed by the occupation.

Is this the "peace" that the Palestinians have to accept as normal?

The fact that neither the US nor Israel can accept is that the fundamental cause of violence in the West Bank, Gaza and in Israel itself is the ongoing zionist occupation of Palestinian land.

The occupiers attempt to pass themselves off as victims of irrational hatred, but there is nothing irrational about a people's determination to cast off oppression and to exercise their inalienable national rights.

The Palestinians know what they have been fighting for and their newly elected president understands that they will not accept the current Sharon scheme, already backed by President Bush, of evacuating a small number of illegal settlements, mainly in Gaza, in order to annex most of the West Bank to Israel.

The British government's previously clear support for a two-state solution, based on 1967 borders, has been muted since the US president backed Mr Sharon's "disengagement" plan.

It must be pressed to find its voice and, in the event of no response from Israel, to push for suspension of Israel's trading preferences with the EU, as proposed by the War on Want campaign.



» Click to find more of PA's online edition.






blog comments powered by Disqus
Take a Stand
( 10/01/2003 18:49 )


newcatcher@cpusa.org