Home  
0
0

Contact Us

Feedback Form

About Us

Web Links

Visit this group

Ponzi Capitalism and the Deepening Moral Crisis

The Roller Coaster: The Communist Party in the 1940s

Rebuilding the Labor Movement in the 21st Century, an Interview with Scott Marshall

Police Escalate Attacks on First Amendment Rights

Public Option: Worth the Fight

Our Socialist Inheritance and Future

Past, Present and Future: The Politics of Reform in the Era of Obama

Needed: Constitutional Amendment for the Right to a Earn a Living Wage

Why Should Grassroots Liberals Consider Marxism?

Is That Specter Really Collapsing?

Carlo Tresca: The Dilemma of an Anti-Communist Radical

The Brief, Revolutionary Life of Joe Hill

Movie Review: Giải phóng Sài Gòn

Review: Logicomix: An Epic Search for Truth

Poetry, November 2009

/Archives - Dates and Topics /2007 – online /June – July 2007 /Jun. 18 – Jun. 24 Print | Send to friend

G8 Climate Change Agreement Future Doubtful



click here for related stories: environment/nature
6-18-07, 10:11 am


The Summit of the Group of Eight that ended on June 8 in Heiligendamm in Germany issued the chair’s summary on political and security issues and a declaration on the world economy.

On the prevention of global warning, the largest agenda at the summit meeting, the declaration stated that the summit countries “will consider seriously the decisions ... which include at least a halving of global emissions by 2050.” However, it failed to set numerical targets, including the benchmark year for emission controls, leaving it as a future task.

Urgent global task

This summit focused on whether the United States, the largest emitter of greenhouse gases, would be persuaded to participate in the U.N. framework for curbing global warming. It is significant that through negotiations with other countries, the U.S. promised to consider halving global greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. It is a step forward that pressed by the international community, the U.S. which had withdrawn from the Kyoto Protocol agreed to come back to the U.N. framework.

At a meeting scheduled for December in Indonesia, new efforts to prevent global warming will start. The U.S. and other countries should tackle the challenge of effectively halving global emissions in line with the promise made in the summit.

This summit meeting also dealt with diplomatic and security issues such as terrorism and the situation regarding Iran. However, the summit documents completely ignored the challenge of getting rid of nuclear weapons from the world in defiance of the strong demand of the international community. The summit also failed to discuss the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq.

The U.S. and Britain have been waging a war of aggression against Iraq in violation of the U.N. Charter. Concerning the Iraq situation, however, the chair’s summary only condemned “acts of terrorism” and “sectarian violence”, closing its eyes to the fact that the U.S. military rule has brought about the tragedy to Iraq.

Not only in Iraq but also in the U.S. Congress, the call for the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq within a set timeframe is increasing. The fact that the summit failed to take up this question even in this situation ironically shows how sensitive this issue is for the summit countries.

Responsibility of Japanese government

Prime Minister Abe Shinzo is boasting that Japan’s proposal to halve greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 was incorporated into the summit declaration. However, he has never pressed the United States to set binding goals.

Prime Minister Abe must stop taking a subservient attitude to the U.S. and make strong diplomatic efforts to meet international challenges.

From Akahata

| | Save Page to del.icio.us


» Home » Online Edition June Print Edition » Subscribe





blog comments powered by Disqus
Take a Stand
( 10/01/2003 18:49 )


newcatcher@cpusa.org