|
Online at: http://politicalaffairs.net/article/articleview/5728/1/32/ |
High-tech Capitalism and the Class Struggle |
8-16-07, 9:27 am
|
The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionizing the instruments of production and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society…constant revolutionizing of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainty and agitation distinguish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones. All fixed, fast frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions, are swept away, all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify.
From those suppliers it stretches on back through another three or four "tiers" to the sub-suppliers and sub-sub-suppliers. To ensure green light at all points along this line, Dell must watch hundreds of potential bottlenecks around the world, as some 4,500 parts from hundreds of suppliers are shipped to Austin, Texas. On any day, a single missing shipment of components can disrupt the whole operation. It's not uncommon for different transnational corporations to have the same sub-suppliers. While the global auto industry is made up of about 20 multinational corporations, the auto industry supply chain is made up of thousands of suppliers employing over 100,000 workers.
|
|
At a certain stage of their development, the material productive forces of society come in conflict with the existing relations of production, or – what is but a legal expression for the same thing – with the property relations within which they have been at work hitherto. From forms of development of the productive forces these relations turn into their fetters. Then begins an epoch of social revolution. No social order ever perishes before all the productive forces for which there is room in it have developed; and new, higher relations of production never appear before the material conditions of their existence have matured in the womb of the old society itself. (Preface to a Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy)
|