Home  
0
0

Contact Us

Feedback Form

About Us

Web Links

Visit this group

The Rosenberg Case in Historical Perspective

Yes We Can Shut Down the SOA

The Struggle for Women’s Equality in the US Today

Lessons in Coalition Politics: The Indian Left and the Indo-US Nuclear Deal

Another Crisis of Capitalism

The Crash of 2008 and Historical Materialism

My European Vacation: Interviews with Working-class Leaders

Reflections on the (Unplanned) Death of an Ideology

How to Reform Medicare and Create National Health Care

Why a Philosophy of the Natural Sciences is Needed

Reflexiones sobre la muerte (imprevista) de una ideología

Sagebrush Noir: The Western as 'Social Problem' Film

Book Review: Democracy's Prisoner

Book Review: The Politics of Immigration

CD Review: Pete Seeger: At 89

December 2008 Poetry

Table of Contents for December 2008 – January 2009 issue

/Archives - Dates and Topics /2007 – online /October – November 2007 /Nov. 5 – Nov. 11 Print | Send to friend

Civil Rights Groups Oppose Mukasey Nomination



click here for related stories: democracy matters
11-08-07, 1:25 pm

On November 6, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 11-8 to send the nomination of Judge Michael Mukasey to the full Senate for a vote to become the next U.S. Attorney General.

Civil rights groups now oppose the confirmation of Judge Mukasey because he "refused to condemn waterboarding as torture, endorsed broad assertions of executive authority, and failed to make firm commitments to the enforcement of civil rights," according to a November 5 Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR) letter to the Committee.

In two days of hearings, Judge Mukasey, voiced some support for civil rights enforcement, but civil rights groups said it was unclear what actual steps he will take to reform the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division work.


One particular sticking point for many Division watchers was Mukasey's reluctance in the hearings to acknowledge destroyed morale in the Department of Justice. Mukasey frequently referred to the situation as a "perception" and, at one point, interrupted Senator Dick Durbin, D. Ill., to say that he found Department attorneys to be "energized" and "focused."

Additional coverage:
100,000 Protest War, S-CHIP Battle, Islamophobia, and the Nobel Prize

"There have been numerous well-documented reports of low morale and high turnover in the Civil Rights Division," said LCCR Senior Policy Analyst and Special Counsel Julie Fernandes. "Mukasey's comments on this issue indicate a lack of awareness about exactly what has been going on in the Division under the Bush administration."

Though heavy on questions about torture and executive power, civil rights groups paid close attention to Mukasey's response to questioning from Sen. Ben Cardin, D. Md., who focused exclusively on issues pertaining to the Division's civil rights work.

Sen. Cardin acknowledged the hearing's lack of adequate questioning on the Division and honed in on the decrease in the number of cases the Division has brought to protect voting rights and to challenge employment discrimination, the approval of a controversial Georgia voter I.D. law, and a decrease in work to combat racial profiling.

"We are pleased that there were some important conversations on civil rights during the hearings," said Wade Henderson, LCCR president and CEO. "However, the devil is in the details. We are still unsure Mukasey knows the extent to which the Division's work has deteriorated. He should if he is going to adequately fix it."

From Leadership Conference on Civil Rights

| | | | Save Page to del.icio.us


» Home » Online Edition November Print Edition » Subscribe





blog comments powered by Disqus
Take a Stand
( 10/01/2003 18:49 )


newcatcher@cpusa.org