Home  
0
0

Contact Us

Feedback Form

About Us

Web Links

Visit this group

Ponzi Capitalism and the Deepening Moral Crisis

The Roller Coaster: The Communist Party in the 1940s

Rebuilding the Labor Movement in the 21st Century, an Interview with Scott Marshall

Police Escalate Attacks on First Amendment Rights

Public Option: Worth the Fight

Our Socialist Inheritance and Future

Past, Present and Future: The Politics of Reform in the Era of Obama

Needed: Constitutional Amendment for the Right to a Earn a Living Wage

Why Should Grassroots Liberals Consider Marxism?

Is That Specter Really Collapsing?

Carlo Tresca: The Dilemma of an Anti-Communist Radical

The Brief, Revolutionary Life of Joe Hill

Movie Review: Giải phóng Sài Gòn

Review: Logicomix: An Epic Search for Truth

Poetry, November 2009

/Archives - Dates and Topics /2008 – online /July – August 2008 /July 21 - July 31, 2008 Print | Send to friend

Arizona Republicans Force a Second Anti-gay Ballot Measure



click here for related stories: LGBT pride
7-21-08, 10:35 am

Arizona's November ballot will feature an anti-marriage equality initiative.

The initiative was passed in the Republican controlled state senate by the barest margin earlier this month, and would put in place a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage. "Arizona voters rejected a similar measure in 2006," the Human Rights Campaign noted in a recent press statement, "making Arizona the only state where voters have defeated a marriage amendment at the polls. Arizona statutory law already prohibits marriage by same-sex couples."

Additional resources:
Podcast #77 - Getting Out of Iraq

"It is sad and it is disappointing that the Arizona legislature used the final moments of its session to send a divisive, discriminatory measure back to voters this fall," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese.

Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano (D) described the Republican-backed measure as a "prophylactic" amendment that isn't needed. Napolitano said. "I don't think the constitutional amendment is necessary. The voters of Arizona will have a chance to decide this. Personally, I'm going to oppose it."

State Rep. Kyrsten Sinema of Phoenix said, "Arizonans have far more important issues to deal with than adding a redundant ban on marriage by same-sex couples to the state constitution. This referendum is a distraction from real priorities like education, health care, and the economy."

These events raise a couple of questions: Because Arizonans have already voted against this issue, why do Republicans want to waste more tax payer money on an issue meant to be divisive? Is this such a high priority for them?

But more fundamentally, why do Republican opponents of marriage equality care so deeply about excluding queer couples from accessing the social benefits afforded to heterosexual couples? Surely it cannot be that they believe that with 50 percent divorce rates among straight couples that they are somehow saving marriage.

What does my private relationship with another person have to do with another private relationship? Not much.

When it comes right down to it, the issue is one of fundamental fairness for all couples, on one hand. And on the other, irrational hatred and fear of gay and lesbian men and women.

Arizonans already stood up for fairness in 2006. Let's hope they can do it again. And let's hope the Republicans can find better uses for taxpayer dollars than imposing their personal morality on the rest of us.

--Reach Joel Wendland at jwendland@politicalaffairs.net


| | | Share on Facebook | Add to Mixx! | Save Page to del.icio.us | Twitter
 

» Home » Online Edition June-July 2008 Print Edition » Podcast » Editors' Blog





blog comments powered by Disqus
Take a Stand
( 10/01/2003 18:49 )


newcatcher@cpusa.org