Home  
0
0

Contact Us

Feedback Form

About Us

Web Links

Visit this group

A Worker's Vignette – Suspended for Being Sick

Liner Notes to Das Kapital: Marx and Engels Comment

The People vs. the Insurance Monopoly: Fixing the Health System in 2009

Three Questions for Socialists

Barack Obama and the Contours of African American Social Protest Movements

“From Something Evil Good May Come”: Sojourner Truth and the Civil War

Greed as an Explanation of Crisis

Materialism and Feelings: Bringing Marx and Freud to the Same Table

Nine Point Five Theses: Discussion Points for a New Progressive Decade

Towards Peace, Democracy and National Reconciliation in Iraq

Building Bridges with Cuba

Communist Party Statement on Honduras Crisis

Book Review: The Voice of Hope

Book Review: Studs Terkel's Working: A Graphic Adaptation

DVD REVIEW: Fidel: Saul Landau's 1969 Film Reissued as a DVD

Tres preguntas para los socialistas

Story: Tim’s Journal, Part 1

Poetry July 2009

/Archives - Dates and Topics /2008 – online /November 1 – 30, 2008 Print | Send to friend

Occupation of Afghanistan: No Benefit to Anyone



click here for related stories: peace/antiwar
11-21-08, 9:21 am

Original source: Morning Star (UK)

Seven years of British involvement in the US-led illegal occupation of Afghanistan have brought no benefit to the people of either country.

Afghans have been slaughtered in their tens of thousands, for identifying with the "government" of Hamid Karzai, at the hands of the invaders or as a function of "collateral damage," as the slaughter of civilians is now euphemised.

People who have grown up in Britain may find guests firing rifles into the air to celebrate a wedding a little unusual.

The US air force regards such customs as virtually a declaration of war, which is why so many wedding parties have been targeted by a hail of rocket fire and assault by special forces, leading to enormous loss of life.

Additional resources:
Podcast #88 - The Prospect for Democracy in China



US military spokespeople have invariably maintained, even in the face of abundant evidence of slaughtered children, that they hit al-Qaida/Taliban safe houses or military camps.

No-one believes the yarns that are being spun, but too many people are prepared to accept the false prospectus under which military occupation was justified.

Although al-Qaida has historically had military training camps in Afghanistan, this was not necessarily with the consent of the Afghan people.

It was Washington and its close allies in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan that funded, equipped and organized these camps, first against the Soviet Red Army and then against the modernizing secular government of President Najibullah.

The "crimes" committed by the Najibullah government were distributing land from feudal landlords to the landless and extending education to girls and young women.

And yet the White House and Downing Street try to win support for a supposed agenda of women's rights as part justification for their war against the Afghan people.

The conspiracy to attack the Twin Towers and other targets in the US was not hatched in Afghanistan but in Saudi Arabia, from where most of the conspirators hailed, and their motivation was the stationing of US military forces in Saudi Arabia during the first war against Iraq, following Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait.

Neither can the invaders' attempts to claim to be taking effective action to curtail opium poppy production be taken seriously.

The Taliban government had virtually wiped out this crop before the 2001 invasion. In fact, it was US warlord allies in the self-styled Northern Alliance who were up to their necks in the international heroin trade.

There is not a single aspect of the seven-year-long occupation that can be put forward as a success.

Life expectancy has fallen to 43, one in five children die before their fifth birthday, women's rights are a figment of US spin doctors' imagination and the blood of the innocent continues to hemorrhage.

US president-elect Barack Obama's positive message on Iraq does not stretch to Afghanistan.

He has taken on board the fiction, as has Gordon Brown, that security for the US people depends on subjugating Afghanistan and building a form of Washington-approved democracy there.

It has not worked and it will not work. And all the time the lives of Afghans and occupation forces will be lost. There is no positive role for British troops there. This unwinnable war must be ended without delay.


| | | | Share | Add to Mixx! | Save Page to del.icio.us | Twitter
 

Home Podcast Editors' Blog





blog comments powered by Disqus
Take a Stand
( 10/01/2003 18:49 )


newcatcher@cpusa.org