Home  
0
0

Contact Us

Feedback Form

About Us

Web Links

Visit this group

Ponzi Capitalism and the Deepening Moral Crisis

The Roller Coaster: The Communist Party in the 1940s

Rebuilding the Labor Movement in the 21st Century, an Interview with Scott Marshall

Police Escalate Attacks on First Amendment Rights

Public Option: Worth the Fight

Our Socialist Inheritance and Future

Past, Present and Future: The Politics of Reform in the Era of Obama

Needed: Constitutional Amendment for the Right to a Earn a Living Wage

Why Should Grassroots Liberals Consider Marxism?

Is That Specter Really Collapsing?

Carlo Tresca: The Dilemma of an Anti-Communist Radical

The Brief, Revolutionary Life of Joe Hill

Movie Review: Giải phóng Sài Gòn

Review: Logicomix: An Epic Search for Truth

Poetry, November 2009

/Archives - Dates and Topics /2004 – print /July Print | Send to friend

Book Review - The Assassination of Julius Caesar, By Michael Parenti




We often hear the United States compared to ancient Rome – usually negatively. Critics of US foreign policy refer to a new Roman Empire and to Paul Bremer as a proconsul in Iraq. These references are comprehensible because Rome and its institutions, both religious and secular (especially Roman law) are part of the foundations on which so-called Western civilization is based. The founders of the United States used many Roman symbols in representing the new republic (res publica). The imperial eagle, the arrows of war, the olive branch, the idea of a Senate – even the classical architecture of Washington, DC is based on the public buildings of Rome (and Athens). Now that many elements of the right see this country as the dominant world power, the analogies with ancient Rome as a universal empire are becoming more numerous even in the popular media.

Michael Parenti’s new people’s history of Ancient Rome is thus both timely and relevant. Written in his usual popular and accessible style, this book will make available to a wide working-class audience an easily understandable and reliable portrait of Rome at one of its most important historical junctures: the transition from an oligarchical republic to a full-blown imperial system.

The life and death of Julius Caesar is the focal point of this work. Departing from the consensus of classical scholars who refer to Caesar as a tyrant who trampled on the personal liberties and freedoms of Republican Rome symbolized by the rule of the Senate, Parenti marshals convincing evidence to support what has been the minority view – that Caesar was actually a representative of popular democratic tendencies among the Roman people and that his enemies and assassins really stood for the interests of a small elite portion of the ruling class who used the power of the Roman state for personal enrichment and the exploitation of the masses.

The class struggle in Rome was basically between the optimates (the best) who represented the wealthy latifundistas (plantation owners) and the popularis (relating to the people) who tried to improve the living standards of regular citizens of the republic. "As a popularis, Julius Caesar introduced ‘laws to better the condition of the poor,’ as [the ancient historian] Appian wrote," Parenti points out. This is what ultimately cost him his life on March 15, 44 B.C.

The optimates were also the creditor class, and Parenti remarks that their policies created "penury and debt" that crushed average citizens. It was Caesar who tried to alleviate this suffering and prevent the loss of freedom for the debtor, actions "upon which today’s bankruptcy laws are based" – a citizen’s freedom was to be "inborn and unalienable."

Caesar has also been blamed for the destruction of the great library at Alexandria. Parenti shows, however, that the destruction of ancient culture, the burning of books and the closing down of libraries and educational institutions was done by the "Christ worshipers" when they came to power. "Though depicted as an oasis of learning amidst the brutish ignorance of the Dark Ages, the Christian church actually was the major purveyor of that ignorance."
Parenti even suggests that Caesar’s rule was "a dictatorship of the proletarii" since he ruled against the "plutocracy on behalf of the citizenry’s substantive interests." And, he says Cicero, one the most dedicated of the optimates, is quoted as lamenting the fact that Caesar wanted to bestow Roman "citizenship not merely on individuals but on entire nations and provinces." It is no surprise then to discover that even to this day people leave flowers at the site of Caesar’s murder every March 15.

Parenti also criticizes contemporary classicists who ignore the class struggles of the ancient world – seeing the masses as rabble and expressing sympathy for ancient ruling-class elites and their treatment of the common people. Parenti says he has "tried to show [that] what we know of the common people tells us that they displayed a social consciousness and sense of justice that was usually superior to anything possessed by their would-be superiors."

Parenti lists four tenets of the ideology of the optimates which he says characterize "all ruling propertied classes." Namely, 1) the ruling class treats its interests as the general interest; 2) social welfare programs are bad for those who receive them as they "undermine the moral fiber" of the poor; 3) the redistribution of wealth at the expense of the wealthy is detrimental to society as a whole; and 4) attacking the reformers and their characters is a better way to defeat reform than attacking the particular reform itself.

This is an excellent book and a good read. By understanding the class struggle in ancient Rome, as presented by Parenti, we will better understand the struggle being waged in the world of today.

The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome
By Michael Parenti
New York New Press, 2003.





blog comments powered by Disqus
Take a Stand
( 10/01/2003 18:49 )


newcatcher@cpusa.org