Home  
0
0

Contact Us

Feedback Form

About Us

Web Links

Visit this group

Ponzi Capitalism and the Deepening Moral Crisis

The Roller Coaster: The Communist Party in the 1940s

Rebuilding the Labor Movement in the 21st Century, an Interview with Scott Marshall

Police Escalate Attacks on First Amendment Rights

Public Option: Worth the Fight

Our Socialist Inheritance and Future

Past, Present and Future: The Politics of Reform in the Era of Obama

Needed: Constitutional Amendment for the Right to a Earn a Living Wage

Why Should Grassroots Liberals Consider Marxism?

Is That Specter Really Collapsing?

Carlo Tresca: The Dilemma of an Anti-Communist Radical

The Brief, Revolutionary Life of Joe Hill

Movie Review: Giải phóng Sài Gòn

Review: Logicomix: An Epic Search for Truth

Poetry, November 2009

/Archives - Dates and Topics /2008 – online /September 1- 30, 2008 Print | Send to friend

Protests Over Bush Admin. Contraceptives Rule Continue



click here for related stories: women's equality and liberation
9-26-08, 9:22 am

More than 65,000 people submitted comments to the Department of Health and Human Services, rejecting new Bush administration rules that women's health care advocates believe could jeopardize women's access to quality health care. Among those commenting were a bipartisan group of state governors, including Governors Rod Blagojevich (D-IL), Christine Gregoire (D-WA), M. Jodi Rell (R-CT), and Ed Rendell (D-PA), according to a press statement from the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA).

The protests arose over a new Bush administration regulation handed down by Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt that allows health care providers to discriminate against women seeking prescription birth control devices or drugs from pharmacists. Leavitt's order allows pharmacists, for example, to refuse to provide birth control to women based on personal opposition to their use. The rule may also apply to hospitals, health care volunteers, and the like, women's health care advocates said.

Additional resources:
Podcast #84 – What are Green Jobs?



Register to vote here

Before the rule became finalized this week, Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Patty Murray (D-WA) met with Secretary Leavitt and expressed grave concern over protections for women’s health care. They reportedly asked Leavitt to make changes to the final rule to ensure that patients do not lose access to health information or services when a health care provider or volunteer refuses to provide them. Leavitt refused to provide any concrete assurances.

"This regulation unconscionably ignores a patient’s right to receive the critical health care services and information she deserves,” said PPFA President Cecile Richards. “Our concern is that women going to their local hospital or doctor’s office can no longer trust that they will receive the information they need to make the health care decision that is right for them.”

The new aroused widespread anger after readings of the new rule suggested the Bush administration deliberately confused the definitions of contraception and abortion, allowing medical care providers to interpret or define either based on their personal beliefs rather than on commonly accepted medical terms.

Planned Parenthood estimated that the new rule could adversely affect as many as 42 million women. According to recent studies, about 98 percent of women use some form of birth control during their lifetimes.

More than 100 members of Congress have also expressed opposition to the rule.


| | | | Share | Add to Mixx! | Save Page to del.icio.us | Twitter
 

Home Podcast Editors' Blog





blog comments powered by Disqus
Take a Stand
( 10/01/2003 18:49 )


newcatcher@cpusa.org