There is one important primary reason why I had turned communist from social democrat from capitalist: I am no longer worker-alienated. I am given importance. Mao, Lenin and Stalin always mention me in their speeches. I feel good. Ethical considerations are given preference. When I am late, my communist master just passes some humourous anectdotes which makes me work harder inspired by his kind words. My work is given importance. Hence, like the great Che Guevara, if I am made to work Sunday and Saturday without overtime pay, I do it like him.
What are we inside capitalist fiefdom? Scums of the earth! Not given worth except that on Labor day we are being cajoled to strive more. Hence, more profits for my greedy capitalist father whose concubines number more than the number of my fingers!
>
> A Chinese "leftist" is often a Leninist and follow Stalin
> and Mao's popularized(vulgarized?) textbooks,whose ideology
> is learned from, or found in at least, the CCP's middle
> school textbooks!
>
> But we live in a era after Hans Georg Gadamer and Bertrand
> Arthur William Russell.Lenin's philosophy differs from
> Marx,notice this? So on philosophy ,we should return to
> Marx!
>
> Fundamentally,we look foward to ensure human being's
> sustainable interests ,not only some elite's but also the
> mass's.Capitalism, capital-centered system can not serve
> human being's interests well.The subprime mortgage crisis
> of USA is an example. Lack of vigilantness will put the
> world in danger.That is why we want to replace
> capitalism.
>
> The wolrd is changing endlessly.Nobody can tell the future
> for a long time while he can raise his answers to problems
> of his time.Fortunetelling can bring what? How far off is
> the next ice age? It will come too early due to the use of
> glass-house gas energy? People 100 year ago have this
> problem?
>
> The laws of social development is objective?I think social
> development is, and just is, the products of aspirations,
> consequence of ,and context for,the struggles of people
> ,and the analyses, perspectives, strategies ,programs of
> political organizations.
>
> Altogether, social development has no laws although you can
> find laws say,at the level of political scienc, history and
> strategics etc.Social development,radical or
> gradual,depends on improvement of knowledge of persons
> involved.
>
> Social revolution is a conscious act? I think it is an
> "aspiring act". We act on our hope(wish) ,but not on
> apocalypse of some God. A better world is a matter of
> belief ,but not of faith.Our world ,though, probably
> becomes better and better , which makes us happy.
>
> So we oppose history determinism.The "Scientic Socialism"
> is comfortable but transitory,will end up with abandoning
> like Stalinism or guessing like Maoism.
>
> Why Leninism,Stalinism and Maoism are history
> determinism?One is they were in unadvanced countries,Russia
> and China,where emperors were thrown down not long
> before.Another is they were politicians.Where the emperors
> always showed their servile people an absolutism,they had
> to or tried to be so too.
>
> We look upon and evaluate Leninism at the viewpoint of
> act.Speaking of philosophy and some other fundamental
> doctrines,Trotskyism is the same as Leninism ,or a
> variation of Leninism.
>
> In any case,hitherto ,socialism means ending of
> capitalism,but not of history.Socialism,a historic
> movement,is a tentative solution to problems of capitalism,
> based on the current knowledge of people. The world
> changed,the socialists's equations should change too.
>
> "The working class",say ,consists mainly people who do
> manual or industrial labor some time ago.But it is more
> intellectual now.
>
> Socialism is the direction,but tentative.An aspiration ,a
> direction, can hold all details? Only God can do this!
> Although I don't refuse any clear and immediate act,but
> things are not simple.Take socialism as a praxis in a
> whole. Socialism will be carried out by the mass and
> experts as the praxis goes on.
>
> How to implement public property is tentative? Many details
> is pending? Many hypotheses prove naive?
>
> Another thing,”socialism in one country” is
> impossible,ignorant or dishonest ,because peoples around
> the world communicate more and more, characteristics of a
> nation are in the unified global coordinates,isolation is
> impossible.
>
> It is a socialist movement advancing with the times that
> can sublate Bush and Sarkozy's system.
>
> The theory of Surplus Value , a purified model of an
> anarchical capitalism before 1900,is a criticism ,only
> against something some time ago. Capitalism today is much
> more complex.Prices are determined not only by competition
> but also poltical,ecological and alike factors. Privileges
> don't include economic equalities only.
>
> When it comes to China, a real understanding of China is
> essential,uhm? For example,should Mao be blamed? If there
> were no working class at all,with the same attitude as
> those in German ,in China in the 20th century,they were
> peasants while they worked in factories,it is natural that
> Mao practised as an emperor?
>
> Especially,don't take China today as capitalism.It is an
> officialdom-economy.And the mass think differently from
> westerners to some extent,lacking modernity.Pay attention
> to this Chinese characteristic.
>
> It is hard to guess the progress of politics in China.China
> will probably get a better capitalism after the inevitable
> reuniting.
>
> It is too early to detail a stratage.First,freedom of
> speaking...then free ecletion...then the technical part of
> changing the current system.
>
> The classics's meaning is the interpretation you give
> them.The prevailers give a better interpretation. So on
> philosophy ,we should return to Marx!It is important to
> rethink Leninism.The result is a totally different concept
> of socialism ,from Stalin and Mao!An activist need a basic
> understanding of Marx's philosophy,which will determan his
> politics.
>
> For more theoretics, read "Marx's philosophy as the
> hermeneutics ofpraxis" ,the interpretation of Marxism by Yu
> Wujin, a professor in the Department of Philosophy at Fudan
> University .
|
