Forward of an Important Article by Robert Parry for Black History Month by Norman Markowitz

 

As the nation celebrates African-American History Month, focussing selectively on the achievements of famous African Americans and in a general way on Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights movement, mainstream media remains silent on many topics of value to all, from the lifelong achievements of Paul Robeson and W.E.B Dubois, to name two very important figures who are either invisible or mentioned in the most cursory way in mainsteam media, to the struggle against racism today and the historical roots of that struggle.  Below I have cut and pasted a really fine article by veteran independent journalist Robert Parry, whose work on Iran-Contra  and on the CIA's actions against Nicaragua  and CIA involvement in the international cocacine trade which through crack cocaine was destroyed lives in U.S cities  in the 1980s  exposed the Reagan administration's crimes to the world.  In those days, Parry worked for the AP in those days and won the George Polk award for investigative journalism.  He has been a leader in independent journalism for the last two decades, writing very valuable works of historical journalism and editing Consortium News for the last two decades. 
Lynching and Jeff Davis HighwayBy Robert Parry, Consortium News.  The article below deserves widespread distribution,.  I would only add that the racist "red summer" as historians call it today of 1919-1920 should be related directly to the anti-Communist Red Scare, in response to both the Soviet Revolution and the great strikes of 1919 in the U.S, which saw the the KKK emerge from  the South as a national force in the  1920s.  As for Jefferson Davis, he was captured by union troops and imprisoned for two years under fairly harsh conditions.  Ironically he was released on bail in 1867, a one hundred thousand dollar bail posted by the Robber Baron Cornelius Vanderbilt and  two former anti-slaverry activists, Horace Greeley and Gerit Smith, the wealthy abolitionist who earlier had supported John Brown, 

The defeat of Reconstruction provided victories of sorts for Davis.  He wrote histories of the Confederacy and became a hero to the defenders of the "lost cause."  He even got back title to his plantation when the White Supremacy Democrats took control of Mississippi and, more important, developed a relationship with a wealthy plantation owning widow who  left him her planation and a substantial sum of money in 1879.  In general he kept a low profile on the issues involving reconstruction, realizing that as the face of the confederacy he might face retribution, but serious historians make the point that he saw the occupation of the South as both illegal and the result of the domination of Northerners and Blacks.  While he realized that slavery as such could not be re-established, he supported a White Suprmacist South in which Blacks would function as a labor "caste" with any civil rights, something that corresponded to the system of segregation which was  established.  That a highway in the U,S, would be named after Jefferson Davis is to me like naming a highway after Adolf Hitler in a rightwing area of Bavaria in honor of the "lost cause" of the Nazis

Norman Markowitz

A 1920 public lynching in Texas. (photo: Wikimedia Commons)
A 1920 public lynching in Texas. (photo: Wikimedia Commons)

Lynching and Jeff Davis Highway

By Robert Parry, Consortium News

13 February 15

 

 

Many parts of the South, including Arlington, Virginia, just outside the U.S. capital, still honor Confederate President Jefferson Davis by attaching his name to important roadways. But a recent study on lynching puts the motive for honoring that white supremacist in a sickening new light, writes Robert Parry.

 new study of Southern lynching of blacks, sharply raising the total to nearly 4,000 victims, adds some context to the decision in 1920 to attach the name of Confederate President Jefferson Davis to parts of Route One, including stretches near and through African-American neighborhoods. That period was a time when the number of lynchings surged across the South and whites were reasserting their impunity.

According to the study by the Equal Justice Initiative, the use of lynching – mob killings and mutilations of blacks by hanging, burning alive, castration, torture and other means – was nearly as high around 1920 as it was in the latter part of the Nineteenth Century. There was a gradual decline in lynchings in the early Twentieth Century, but the pattern reversed and the use of lynching surged to about 500 during a five-year period heading into 1920.

That period also marked a determination by many Southern whites to reaffirm the rightness of the Confederate cause and to reassert white supremacy. Thus, in 1920, to drive home the point of who was in charge, the Daughters of the Confederacy had Southern states name portions of Route One after Jefferson Davis, who was hailed as the “champion of a slave society” when he was chosen to lead the Confederacy in 1861.

Besides honoring a dyed-in-the-wool white supremacist who favored keeping African-Americans in chains forever, the Daughters of the Confederacy saw these designations of Route One as a counterpoint to plans in the North for a Lincoln Highway in honor of assassinated President Abraham Lincoln.

But bestowing this honor on Jefferson Davis was also a political message of pro-Confederate defiance that was not limited to the brutal era of 1920. The Jefferson Davis designation was extended to parts of Route 110 near the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, in 1964 as Martin Luther King Jr. and the Civil Rights Movement were pressing for landmark civil rights legislation to end segregation and as white Virginian politicians were vowing to resist integration at all costs.

A year or so ago, I wrote to the five members of the Arlington County Board and urged them to seek an end to this grotesque honor bestowed on a notorious white racist. When my letter went public, it was treated with some amusement by the local paper, the Sun-Gazette, which described me as “rankled,” and prompted some hate mail.

One letter from an Arlington resident declared that it was now her turn to be “RANKLED by outsiders like Mr. Parry who want to change history because it is not to his liking. … I am very proud of my Commonwealth’s history, but not of the current times, as I’m sure many others are.”

I was also confronted by a senior Democratic county official at a meeting about a different topic and urged to desist in my proposal to give the highway a new name because the idea would alienate state politicians in Richmond who would think that Arlington County was crazy.

But the new study on the terrorism of lynching reminds us that attaching Jefferson Davis’s name to roadways wasn’t just some romantic gesture to honor an historical figure beloved by Southern whites who in 1920 still pined for the ante-bellum days when they could own black people and do to them whatever they wished.

The years around 1920 marked a violent revival of the carnival-like scenes in which whites treated the lynching of blacks as a moment for community hilarity and celebration, often posing with their children for photographs next to the mutilated corpses. Stamping Jefferson Davis’s name on a highway that passed near and through black neighborhoods was another way to send a chilling message to African-Americans.

In my 37 years living in Virginia, I have always been struck by the curious victimhood of many Southern whites. Because of the Civil War, which some still call “the War of Northern Aggression,” and the Civil Rights Movement, which finally ended segregation, they have been nursing grievances, seeing themselves as the real victims here.

Not the African-Americans who were held in the unspeakable conditions of bondage until slavery was finally ended in the 1860s and who then suffered the cruelties of white terrorism and the humiliation of segregation for another century. No, the whites who lorded over them were the real “victims” because the federal government finally intervened to stop these practices.

Yet, while some white Virginians remain “very proud” of that history, there has been a studied neglect of other more honorable aspects of Arlington’s history, including the role played by Columbia Pike as an African-American Freedom Trail where thousands of former slaves, freed by Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, traveled north to escape slavery.

Many were given refuge in Freedman’s Village, a semi-permanent refugee camp along Columbia Pike on land that now includes the Pentagon and the Air Force Memorial. Some of the men joined the U.S. Colored Troops training at nearby Camp Casey before returning to the South to fight for freedom, to end the scourge of slavery once and for all.

As blacks joined the Union Army, Confederate President Jefferson Davis ratified a policy that refused to treat black men as soldiers but rather as slaves in a state of insurrection, so they could be executed upon capture or sold into slavery.

In accordance with this Confederate policy, U.S. Colored Troops faced summary executions when captured in battle. For instance, when a Union garrison at Fort Pillow, Tennessee, was overrun by Confederate forces on April 12, 1864, black soldiers were shot down as they surrendered. Similar atrocities occurred at the Battle of Poison Springs, Arkansas, in April 1864, and the Battle of the Crater in Virginia. Scores of black prisoners were executed in Saltville, Virginia, on Oct. 2, 1864.

Yet, while Jefferson Davis’s name remains on roadways through Arlington — and as the Confederate president is effectively honored whenever people have to use his name — there is still no commemoration of Freedman’s Village (though something is supposedly being planned) and no one apparently even knows the precise location of Camp Casey, arguably one of Arlington’s most significant and noble historical sites. (Camp Casey is believed to have been located close to where today’s Pentagon now is, an area that in the 1860s was called Alexandria County before being renamed Arlington County in the Twentieth Century.)

Apparently, recognizing the place where free African-Americans were trained and armed to defeat the Confederacy and end slavery might “rankle” some white Arlington residents.

 

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.

Comments

  • Thanks once more to e.e.w clay for his valuable commentary. There are of course other examples of this, the public institutions named after Nathan Bedford Forrest, the Confederate General and founder of the KKK, the various forms of "celebration" that still exist for the confederacy, and also the denial of the century of atrocities that followed the defeat of Reconstruction, chain gang labor, poll taxes, lynching, events that were called "race riots" but resembled pogroms.
    Naming roads and schools and parks and other public facilities for those who perpretated such atrocities not only overtly denies the existence of this history, but covertly celebrates it
    Norman Markowitz

    Posted by norman markowitz, 02/20/2015 7:11pm (9 years ago)

  • As it happens, I live one block east of the "Jefferson Davis Hightway", Route 1. North of me it is called the "Richmond Highway" and then up further north it is the "Jefferson Davis Highway" again. Much of the minority population of the non-town of Woodbridge, VA where I live (working class African Americans and Latinos) live along the Jeff Davis Highway. I can imagine no greater insult. But when I have talked to some of my neighbors they don't recall who Jefferson Davis was. When I say "he was the president of the rebel confederacy during the Civil War", they are indignant. Time to start a campaign to change this and many other names.

    Posted by , 02/18/2015 11:21pm (9 years ago)

  • Douglass Blackmon's, author's name, should be spelled accordingly, not Blackman's.

    Posted by E.E.W. Clay, 02/17/2015 3:03pm (9 years ago)

  • One cannot help to make an analogy, today, between racist police officers, racist institutionalized racism, the hundreds and hundreds of racist white police "fraternities" and "unions", who, decrying the "cruel and unusual" treatment and persecution of Darren Wilson, minimizing the public execution (reminiscent of lynching) of Mike-Mike Brown and the Kangaroo Court of his Grand Jury "investigation", with its egregious legal errors and precedents, its racist implications by the " victimized", notoriously racist actions and inactions of Robert Mc Colloch, St. Louis County Prosecutor, Govenor Jeremiah "Jay" Nixon, the state of Missouri, and Jefferson Davis, his Mississippi, his anti-human, bestial, "gallant", South-with all the attendant racist, anti-human, anti-working class, lies, myths and fantasies.
    It is not as if the future of this country, and with it, the future of all humanity is not at stake.
    Hitler, Jefferson Davis and U. S. genocide against its African American citizenry cannot ever be justified nor excused-neither can the failure of Reconstruction at the hands of the KKK.
    Douglass A. Blackman's book, Slavery by Another Name, details some horrors of a new form of ante-bellum slavery in the United States of America, as it affected African Americans after the Civil War.
    The Nazi Holocaust, Ferguson today and the horrors of the Civil War in the U. S. show the inescapable results of genocide, slavery and oppression-how long-or, shall we allow the cultural and social patterns that support these crimes against humanity extinguish the human race?

    Posted by E.E.W. Clay, 02/17/2015 1:50pm (9 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments