Time to close ranks behind this President

After last night's election results, it has become pretty clear what gobs of campaign cash from secret corporate donors will do to America's democratic process – thanks to a right-wing Supreme Court decision in the Citizens United case.

While the outcome may not be attributable entirely to that single cause, it certainly played a huge role. Indeed, the election could be regarded as little more than a corporate coup against U.S. democracy. Clearly, this wasn't a grassroots upsurge, but a corporate movement that used the voices of Tea Party people to link the corporate agenda of lower taxes for the rich, limits on environmental and Wall Street regulation, globalization, etc. to a reform-in-name only movement.

Consider the failure of major Tea Party candidates. What does this mean? Simply that corporate and establishment Republicans rode the Tea Party wave into power and left that movement behind. Expect to hear nothing of the Tea Party in a few months.

And if you weren't sure what the GOP is all about, newly elected Republicans are vowing to stick it to the unemployed in order to pay for new tax cuts for the rich.

Early numbers indicate that most Democratic losses were in "lean Republican" districts and states that were won in recent election cycles, mostly in the Midwest and the South, an indication of no major national ideological shift. The biggest single chunk came out of the Democrat's right-wing, the Blue Dog caucus, revealing that posing as Democrats holds little meaning for voters. According to one report:

...the conservative Blue Dog Democratic caucus was more than sliced in half from 54 members to only 26. Further, of the 34 conservative Dems who voted against Obama's Healthcare Reform, a mere 12 won re-election.

In addition, President Obama's campaign push in the final weeks of the campaign helped Democratic candidates and energized many Democratic voters. His call for building a stronger movement for change should be heeded.

A study of the impact of racist messages by Republican candidates and voter suppression will follow.

Analysis of the labor movement's role in preventing worse losses will also follow.

What can we hope for? A Democratic Senate will check the ultra-right agenda the Republicans push in the House. President Obama will be a stop-gap for much of their craziness.

However, there will be a great amount of pressure to pass a compromise agenda that sees a mixture of harmful social program budget cuts to pay for more tax cuts for the rich, a push for more war in Central Asia, a halt on meaningful civil rights and environmental legislation, a renewed struggle over health reform – not to improve it, but to scale it back, and an even bigger backlash against immigrants.

As wasteful and despicable as it would be, it might be somewhat amusing to see Republicans try to fulfill their ultimate fantasy of launching investigations into the President's birth certificate and the like. It would be such a distraction and such a miserable failure that voters would tire quickly. We could see a recall election in a few weeks.

I don't think the Democrats should be afraid to push forward in this lame duck session. I expect, however, they will be disinclined to do much. Perhaps the DREAM Act, an important law that will provide tens of thousands of immgirant youths a path to citizenship through public service, perhaps a repeal of "don't ask, don't tell," maybe a new jobs bill. Mostly hand-wringing and finger-pointing. The usual.

Regardless of these possibilities, it is time to close ranks behind this president. Now is not the time to falter or to get queasy. Rebulding for the next election will be a monumental balancing act: blocking the GOP's agenda, making legislative gains when and where possible, fighting for economic recovery, labor law reform, environmental protections, and civil rights measures, supporting the president's planned troop withdrawals from Iraq and Afghanistan in 2011, as well as promoting unity among left and center forces for 2012.

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.


  • We had better develop a policy of "close ranks behind the grassroots and greenshoots".
    Positive moves and perspectives of our Obama,who we support,our first African American president notwithstanding,as Eric Michael Dyson,the non-communist says: Obama is a politician,not a visionary-no MLK,no W.E.B. Du Bois,no Paul Leroy Robeson,no Julian Bond.
    We can hear Obama now"I didn't say a didn't support war,I said I don't support stupid wars."
    It is the incredibly stupid,who qualify war and engage accordingly-with the possible exception of peaceful class war-engaging the whole working people-everywhere.
    We the visionaries of visionaries,the Elizabeth Flynns,the Henry Winstons,the Benjamin Davises had better be very careful who we "close ranks" behind.
    Seriously,we cannot and will not close ranks behind any excuse for the organized murder of war.
    We will only close ranks behind peace,economic progress,people and nature before profits.
    No political expediency will ever change this-not in 2010,2020,2030.

    Posted by peaceapplause, 11/04/2010 10:18am (8 years ago)

  • I agree here. Good initial thoughts. I think racism played a huge role in this election and has been under-discussed. I think the left needs to do some self-reflection on their drive to criticize the president in ways that – maybe unintentionally – gives credence to the right-wing's racist accusation that this president isn't comeptent.

    Posted by Glynna A., 11/03/2010 10:27pm (8 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments